On one of the groups I follow, a member wrote, "Those who say ghosts do not exist and anything paranormal is the product of a fanciful mind should really think again. Chances are you will eventually have an experience that you cannot chalk up to perceived normal reality." She went on to cite an anecdote that made her point that there are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in our philosophy.
I agree with Shakespeare, but I exclude the paranormal, and said so. She asked why I was so skeptical about the paranormal, adding, "I
would say it is because no truly paranormal event that you could not
explain has ever happened to you. However, for me it has. I have seen
spirits on a number of occasions throughout my life, not to mention
other paranormal happenings."
In my defense, I said I find reality so rich, to interesting, so rewarding that I'm not
interested in the unreal—other to be curious why so many people find the paranormal
so rich, so interesting, and so rewarding.
I know that many people believe they have seen spirits on a number of occasions. They have had a genuine experience and assigned meaning to it. I do
not doubt, I do not question the experience. I believe the experience is real. I do question the meaning they have assigned to the experience—that what they have seen (experienced) is a ghost or a spirit.
One might respond to my skepticism by asking, "But what else could it be?"
I have no idea. There is
far more to reality than I can understand or explain. But a paranormal
experience by definition cannot be explained by logic or science. All
that says to me is that logic and science are, in certain situations,
limited; we do not know everything.
But we do not have to drag in ghosts, spirits, or the supernatural
to explain the experience.
We simply have to say, "We don't know."