Dr. Ardain Isma a professor at the University of North Florida, asked this question on a LinkedIn group. He pointed out that historical 
fiction is hardly new. "Recently, though, Madison Smart Bell and others 
seem to be making a new name for themselves in writing historical 
novels. My question is this: Do you think writing historical novels 
would be the best advice for emerging writers? I honestly would like to 
see what you have to say on this fast becoming the new darling in 
literary genres."
I think that trying to write for "the new darling in literary genres" is a fool's errand. 
I think that writing an historical novel because you love the period, 
know the culture and the customs, believe you can create living, 
breathing characters can be satisfying and rewarding. 
I believe that anyone who advises emerging writers to chase after the 
market, whatever it is—paranormal, romance, chick-lit, historical 
fiction—is irresponsible at best and toxic at worst. 
Write the story you must write. Write the story you want to read that no
 one else has written. Make it as engaging as you (and your agent, 
editor, writers group, first readers) can make it and perhaps you'll 
create a new literary genre for which fools will try to write.
Many of my friends cite historical fiction as their favorite kind of book to read. I also think there is no harm in trying it out as a writer--but of course if it stinks, pull the plug ASAP.
ReplyDelete